Quantcast
Channel: Institutional FX – FinanceFeeds
Viewing all 886 articles
Browse latest View live

ICE suspect of potential anticompetitive practices after merger

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Global operator of exchanges and clearing houses Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) agreed to buy energy trading software provider Trayport from BGC Partners Inc. for $650 million in stock in November 2015.

However, ICE already holds the dominion of the European energy trading by controlling markets for refined products, natural gas and Brent crude oil. And with the merger completed, Trayport is operating for ICE in the less regulated over-the-counter (OTC) territory.

With MiFiD II kicking in, increased trading obligations are forcing the financial services industry to reshape itself. During the announcement, ICE Chairman and CEO Jeff Sprecher said: “European regulators have made clear that they do not expect OTC gas and power markets to be subject to the mandatory clearing provisions that are being applied to other commodity markets”.

The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), however, shows concerns of potential anticompetitive practices to be perpetrated by the financial group: “ICE is the leading exchange for energy trading in the UK, and in Europe, and based on the evidence we’ve gathered, it may have the ability and incentive to increase prices and/or reduce the quality of Trayport’s software products and services – on which its rivals are dependent – in order to divert trading from rival exchanges, OTC brokers and clearinghouses to its own exchange and clearinghouse, and/or in order to protect its market position from increased competition.”

“Given these concerns and their potential effect on those providers that currently compete with ICE, along with extensive third party concerns, we think the merger warrants an in-depth investigation unless ICE can offer suitable undertakings”, said Andrea Coscelli, CMA Executive Director of Markets and Mergers, and decision-maker in the phase 1 investigation.

Unless ICE is able to offer undertakings which address the competition concerns until 5 May 2016, the CMA will be referring for an in-depth phase 2 investigation by an independent group of panel members.

The post ICE suspect of potential anticompetitive practices after merger appeared first on FinanceFeeds.


82 years after 1934 Act, SEC seeks comment on CAT plan

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has the Rule 613 of Regulation NMS (National Market System) that requires the SRO the self-regulatory organization to jointly submit a NMS plan to create, implement and maintain a consolidated audit trail (CAT) database that would capture, in a single, consolidated data source, customer and order event information for orders in NMS securities, across all markets.

Only following the financial crisis and the 2010 flash crash, the Securities Exchange Commission decided to adopt Rule 613 and made the required submission on July 11, 2012. Now, the SEC is sharing the proposal and a detailed preliminary economic analysis of the proposal, including cost analysis and discussion of economic effects. The regulator is open for public comment within 60 days, and within 180 days the CAT NMS plan will be approved.

CAT rules on reporting information to the central repository regarding options market maker quotations apply to options exchanges only, and exclude market makers from any obligations.

SEC Chair Mary Jo White said: “The Commission’s action to approve the proposed CAT plan for public comment is a major market structure milestone.  CAT will enable regulators to harness today’s technology to enhance the regulation and oversight of today’s trading markets. It will significantly increase the ability of regulators to conduct research, reconstruct market events, monitor market behavior, and identify and investigate misconduct.”

Broker-dealers will record and report information, including the identity of the customer, of all orders and transactions in the US equity and options markets.

 

The post 82 years after 1934 Act, SEC seeks comment on CAT plan appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Exclusive: Kieron Yorke joins ANTUIT as Director of Financial Sales Services

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

A great deal of progress, and a lot of diversification can occur in just 8 years.

In 2008, when Lehman Brothers went into administration as one of the most high profile casualties of the global financial crisis and ‘credit crunch’, senior industry executive Kieron Yorke was Head of European Operations.

An institutional career within the giants of London’s financial center had brought Mr. Yorke at a young age to prominence with just under five years in this executive position where he was responsible for the monitoring and execution of 350+ trades weekly within high volume timeline-critical environment.

At this point, Mr. Yorke was accountable for the management of 1000+ accounts and portfolio assets of $500 million, however after the demise of Lehman Brothers, Mr. Yorke’s interest in technology for the corporate and institutional trading sector, especially big data and analytics burgeoned.

Today, FinanceFeeds spoke to Mr. Yorke, who revealed his latest appointment, which is effective this week.

ANTUIT, which is an analytics and big data solutions provider which uses algorithmic methodology to provide customer information, multiple customer touch points and what it considers to be disruptive channels for transforming data into usable sections, has appointed Mr. Yorke as Director of Financial Sales Services.

Mr. Yorke joins ANTUIT from Sinus Iridum where he spent two years as Director of Financial Sales Services, which provides services to the financial sector in areas relating to complex data sets surrounding fraud, AML, risk, trading platforms, retail activity investigations, and disaster recovery.

Joining Sirus Iridum in 2014 came after 5 years at Terremark European Partner Network, where he was Head of Core Technology for the EMEA region, Mr. Yorke became widely recognized as a prolific writer, having published several analytical and investigative research pieces on the FX, financial services and electronic trading industry, marking himself out as a reference point in specialist areas for the industry.

Mr. Yorke’s understanding of large software projects within the financial sector began before his tenure at Lehman Brothers, as he was Head of Sales for the Capita Financial Software division multinational professional services consultancy Capita.

Fluent in German, English and French, Mr Yorke has an understanding of Mandarin.

He holds three almae matres from Oxford University, having graduated in 2002 from Oxford’s Said Business School with a Masters of Business Administration, preceded by a Batchelors degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics in 1992, with his first degree being a Batchelors Degree in French Language and Literature, which he studied simultaneously, graduating in 1992.

Holding professional qualifications which range from CISCO certification to cloud security and IT project management certification ITIL, as well as VMWare VSP qualification, Mr. Yorke holds 7 industry qualifications.

Mr. Yorke is a frequent contributor to FinanceFeeds with extensive research on specialist subjects within the global FX and electronic trading sector having been published.

The post Exclusive: Kieron Yorke joins ANTUIT as Director of Financial Sales Services appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Thomson Reuters first none bank entity to sign The Women in Finance Charter

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Financial and Risk services giant Thomson Reuters, with operations in financial professional & marketplaces, enterprise solutions and media, among operations in Legal, Property & Science, and Tax & Accounting, has signed today The Women in Finance Charter, active in the UK.

Being the first signatory outside the banking sector, Thomson Reuters pledges to assure for gender balance across the UK financial services industry and committed itself to see gender parity at all levels for a more balanced and fair industry. Already signed up are Virgin Money, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Barclays, and Lloyds Banking Group.

The origins of the Charter go back to recommendations by Jayne-Anne Gadhia, CEO at Virgin Money, for HM Treasury. The paper was called “Empowering Productivity: harnessing the talents of women in financial services” and called for a long-term commitment to support the progression of women into senior roles in financial services, as well as to create a diversity strategy with internal targets.

Jayne-Anne Gadhia commented on the news: “I am delighted that Thomson Reuters has decided to sign the Women in Finance Charter. Signing the Charter is important because it sends out a strong signal about what’s important to you as a business: the importance of gender equality, diversity and inclusivity as well as promoting senior female representation in professional and financial services more broadly.”

David Craig, president, Financial & Risk at Thomson Reuters said: “We need to continue to manage the flow of talent to the top of the organization so that it properly reflects the diversity of the society we inhabit and the customers we serve. It isn’t about meeting gender targets today – it’s about creating an environment, a culture, which attracts and retains the best people because it offers them the opportunity to succeed and to excel, it’s about an open and inclusive culture that drives better performance.”

According to an OECD estimate, labor market gender equality could boost British GDP by 10 percent by 2030. However, women in Britain are still underrepresented in the financial services industry: accounting for only 14% of executive committees in 2015. Also, women in the finance industry are estimated to earn 55% less annually than men, according to the Equality and Human Rights Commission. That is much wider than the 28% pay gap seen across the overall economy in the UK. But a 5-year perspective shows some improvement in financial services: women in board positions in the FTSE 100 were 12.5% in 2010, and more than doubled to 26% in 2015, according to Davies Review.

Since its inception, FinanceFeeds has made several feature articles about women in the finance industry, including interviews with Mehtap Onder, Regional Director at CFH Clearing Limited, and Natallia Hunik, Global Head of Sales at Advanced Markets LLC & Fortex Inc, and Diana Munoz, as well as a talk with Swissquote’s Peter Rosenstreich about female CEOs in publicly traded stock companies.

In celebration of our 1,000th post in April, FinanceFeeds uncovered the extraordinary impact that women have on the FX industry and celebrated their success with a bundle of interviews with Laoura Salveta (Head of Marketing at FXPRIMUS), Sarah Henry (VP Marketing and Operations at ConversionPros), Tamara Manoni (Senior Marcom Manager at MarketsPulse), Katy Parks (Account Manager at Tradesocio), Nicolette Yuen (Marketing and Communications at Blackwell Global), Aviya Arika (Offshore Banking Specialist at Tal Ron Drihem & Co Law Firm), Valeria Bednarik (Chief Analyst at FXStreet), Eva Antoniou (Sales Manager, Southern Europe at TradingCentral), and Yarden Fineman, (Sales Manager at TradersEducation). To read FinanceFeeds’ post “Celebrating the successes of the leading ladies within the FX industry”, click here

wooomen

The post Thomson Reuters first none bank entity to sign The Women in Finance Charter appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Counterparty credit risk in FX: A very close look – FinanceFeeds Research

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

The risk arising from the possibility that the counterparty may default on amounts owned on a derivative transaction has become a focal point for liquidity providers, prime brokerage, and even Tier 1 banks whose liquidity is aggregated by non-bank institutional providers which connect retail trading platforms via a single point connection.

This matter has become so vitally important that it is becoming increasingly difficult for OTC FX brokerages to secure relationships with prime brokers for providing FX (and other electronically traded asset classes) on an OTC basis to retail customers.

What is the main difficulty?

There is a very large school of thought that attributes the increasing difficulties in securing credit with banks to the Swiss National Bank’s decision to remove the 1.20 peg on the EURCHF pair in January 2015 which caused unprecedented market volatility, and exposed many retail and commercial brokerages which process their order flow on an agency (A-book) basis to negative client balances, meaning that they owed the bank sums of capital that could not be repaid, and in some cases were forced out of business.

The larger brokers survived, but were impacted heavily.

It is clear, however, that the Swiss National Bank’s decision was absolutely not the reason why credit is hard to obtain, nor was it a catalyst, as the banks which handle the majority of FX order flow were already looking closely at counterparty credit risk well before the ‘black swan’ event of January 2015, and in fact were doing so during a period of sustained low volatility.

On June 30, 2014, Citigroup, the world’s number one FX dealer by market share, handling 16.11% of the global interbank order flow in 2015, published a corporate document on advanced approaches and disclosures for the Basel III regulatory framework for banks which separated OTC derivatives business in terms of probability of default (PD) compared to many other aspects of business.

When taking a look at the risk weight which was determined by that report, despite the much lower capital provided, the probability of default is substantially higher as per this table:

Capture

Source: Citigroup

Just two months later, the low volatility of the markets was emphasized by FXCM CEO Drew Niv in the second quarter earnings call of 2014, futher illustrating the safe situation that the markets had been in for a sustained period of time “The challenging market conditions continued in Q2. Currency volatility which has been declining steadily since June 2013 continued to drop throughout the second quarter hitting record lows near to end of June and continuing to drop in the month of July” said Mr. Niv at the time.

As the call continued, Mr. Niv stated “The volatility dropped to levels lower than any in the 21 years since the currency volatility index has been calculated. Last quarter, I said that the first three months of this year were the worst trading conditions I had seen in the 15 plus years I have been in this business, and I need to revise that statement that Q2 was much worse.”

Bearing this in mind, banks were taking a very conservative approach to credit risk, even in market conditions which were in their favor.

Indeed, as far back as 2010, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York produced a document about credit risk in FX, detailing its best practice guidelines which apply to banks giving credit to FX brokers and prime brokers on an OTC basis.

Within these guidelines were two important frameworks:

Netting agreements

These are agreements that reduce the size of counterparty exposures by requiring the counterparties to offset trades so that only a net amount in each currency is settled and provide for a single net payment upon the closeout of all transactions in the event of a default or termination event.

Collateral arrangements

These are arrangements in which one or both parties to a transaction agree to post collateral (usually cash or liquid securities) for the purpose of securing credit exposures that may arise from their financial transactions.

During 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act was sworn into US law by President Obama, an act which prescribed that all OTC retail FX firms should have a net capital adequacy for regulatory purposes of no less than $20 million.

Banks taking the cautious line – Watch the percentages in the terms and conditions

The New York Federal Reserve considers that much higher requirements are in place, even though it is widely recognized in the retail FX industry that the stipulations made by the US government are far in excess of those made anywhere else.

The central bank asked participants some 6 years ago to consider an example in which a client had a net positive mark-to-market exposure to Lehman Brothers of $50 million.

With an agreement by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in place, the client was able to net the outstanding positions and was ensured that Lehman would be unable to “cherry pick” the winning trades from the losing trades.

However, without a CSA (credit support annex) in place and the associated placement of collateral, the client was still forced to replace the positions lost due to the bankruptcy, or the $50 million replacement cost, and wait for a number of years for some recovery on its $50 million claim in the bankruptcy.

A year later, banking giants HSBC and JPMorgan founded FX prime brokerage businesses, and the liquidity from both institutions is now commonly present as part of aggregated feeds provided by broker technology firms and non-bank specialist liquidity providers to FX brokerages.

When examining the terms and conditions set out by JPMorgan’s prime brokerage division, it is clear that a very conservative approach was taken from the outset.

In July 2012, the firm stated that the amounts which may be rehypothecated under a Prime Brokerage or margin account relationship are generally limited to 140% of the outstanding liability (or debit balance) to the Prime Broker or lender (or such other applicable legal limit).

For the purposes of the return of any collateral to customer, the account agreements provide for the return of obligations by delivering securities or other financial assets of the same issuer, class and quantity as the collateral initially transferred.

How much do I need to operate directly with a Tier 1 bank? – I find out….

Research that I conducted with regard to opening a client deposit account for FX brokerages demonstrated not only the variation between large, Tier 1 banks and their criteria, but also the commercial attitude toward retail FX brokerages.

NatWest, part of the RBS group, as well as RBS’ corporate division itself, stipulate no minimum deposit and no required minimum daily balance for client money holding accounts, however when I enquired as to whether this service was available for small retail FX brokerages, the answer was a resounding no. Law firms and insurance agents, yes, but FX companies serving retail clients, no.

Chase Private Client, the client money holding account offered by Chase, will accept certain FX brokerages according to very stringent conditions but expects a $250,000 average ledger balance to be maintained at all times (made up of either cash or qualifying deposits and investments linked with the account – ie collateral) and a minimum daily balance of $15,000 or more.

Bearing in mind that this is a separate matter from operating capital requirements and operating costs, and a separate matter from regulatory capital requirements, it is clear that banks have a strict risk management profile.

How brokers are looking to mitigate risk, yet offer modern and attractive services

Smaller brokerages which transfer their entire order flow to their liquidity providers, and white label partners of retail brokerages should bear in mind that if they are operating a pure A-book (which is very very rare) the chances of being outside these parameters is high, and therefore at the end of the liquidity chain, the banks will intervene, ultimately limiting the activities of smaller, less capitalized firms.

It is possible for all brokerages to assess this carefully by using online services such as the S&P Global Market Intelligence Platform, which is designed to help firms measure and manage their credit risk exposure by screening benchmark relative financial and credit metrics.

Companies such as Traiana, which is the post-trade clearing, risk management and settlement division of British interdealer brokerage ICAP, provide services including automated post-trade processing for give-ups, allocations and clearing of CFDs, which have become very popular since the Swiss National Bank event in January 2015 as a form of OTC futures contract which many brokerages are viewing as a means of lowering the risk of negative balance exposure which may ensue from high volatility.

Britain’s electronic trading sector has, for many years, been centered on CFD trading and spread betting, necessitating the development and maintenance of proprietary platforms by London’s long-established retail FX giants.

During the last two years, there has been a distinct drive toward taking the CFD product to an international audience, and some very significant mergers and acquisitions have come about as a result, a notable example being the purchase of City Index by GAIN Capital for a sum that was at the time reported to be $118 million in October 2014.

Subsequently, it emerged that the net purchase price was actually $82 million, which included $36 million in cash.

The drive toward adding CFDs to global product ranges was relatively short lived, and has now become a very quiet and somewhat distant dynamic. It may well be that the reason for this is the inability to clear currency-based CFDs, despite certain services being available to clear equity CFDs as per the Traiana Harmony network, and also the very wide spreads which can ensue due to the OTC nature of a futures contract being intrinsically difficult to assess from a buy-side perspective.

Today’s new dynamic is hailing from North America, where the institutional exchange technology providers and exchange-traded futures and equities platform developers are looking closely toward a retail audience, which sets a centralized exchange in position.

It will be interesting to monitor the approach to risk management and how much counterparty credit ratios differ should this be adopted on a widespread basis in the United States… QED.

The post Counterparty credit risk in FX: A very close look – FinanceFeeds Research appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Veteran FXDD dealer Sascha Szyfman leaves Bank of America, becomes Associate at Goldman Sachs

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

From the 7th World Trade Center to the heart of Wall Street, Sascha Szyfman, whose illustrious career includes three years at New York based retail FX brokerage FXDD has been appointed Associate at Goldman Sachs.

Two years ago, Mr. Szyfman left FXDD, his final position with the company having been Manager of German Department where he was responsible for managing the German customer support desk at FXDD, and ensuring that material was presented to clients in German-speaking markets in an effective manner.

Mr. Szyfman also managed the FX Options desk, overseeing the department during the period of time which the Dodd-Frank Act was invoked, where Mr. Szyfman was responsible for producing reports in compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act and its European counterpart, EMIR.

During his tenure within the FX Options desk, Mr. Szyfman’s responsibilities included the management of risk, trade execution, and liquidity for a-book order flow, including 30+ FX pairs and Gold & Silver, along with resolving settlement, trade allocation issues with all counterparties and prime brokerages.

30ef86f

A year at FXDD’s dealing desk completed Mr. Szyfman’s tenure at the prominent North American brokerage at a time when the firm made its exit from the US market and transferred its North American client base to FXCM, setting the scene for his foray into the interbank sector with an executive position at Bank of America.

Two years have passed since Mr. Szyfman joined Bank of America as Vice President of Product Control Professional GT&O, a period during which he oversaw product control within the Global Technology and Operations division of the bank, a business unit within which Bank of America invested significant resources four years ago in order to place an emphasis on risk management as a result of the emergence of new banking technologies.

Having now moved on to Goldman Sachs as Associate, Mr. Szyfman will undergo a further development stage in his career, increasing his providence within the banking sector.

Associates at Goldman Sachs are the subject of a three and a half year development program, during which exposure to several transactions across multiple sectors, regions and products creates a basis for preparation for senior deal management.

Mr. Szyfman entered the banking sector from the retail FX business at a very interesting time, as it followed Bank of America’s investment in incresing its FinTech orientated approach toward risk management and the ability to maintain a foothold in the development of systems that keep the company in the forefront of banking technology.

Four years ago, a full two years before Mr. Szyfman joined Bank of America, encumbent Global Technology and Operations Executive Cathy Bessant had focused on the bank’s need to ensure that its operations become more lean and efficient moving forward, and in doing so the technology and operations team must to play a vital role in Bank of America’s objective to simplify and modernize the company.

In the summer of 2012, Bank of America was engaged in the process of reducing the number of data centers on which it relied, and had a goal to reduce the number of applications it uses by 50 percent by 2014. “It’s not just about reduction,” Ms. Bessant stated at the time. “It’s about changing work process so things can be done more reliably and efficiently.”

Ms. Bessant and her team were also charged with the task of reducing risk and enabling the business strategies of the company while pursuing efficiency where possible. That mentality has spurred an overarching philosophy of “bringing tech and ops together,” stated Ms. Bessant. “I describe it as: If the clients are the heart of the company, we’re the spine. What we do is highly complicated and large-scale, but it’s really important to keep the whole system moving and keep it functioning.”

 

The post Veteran FXDD dealer Sascha Szyfman leaves Bank of America, becomes Associate at Goldman Sachs appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Mobile-led retail platform technology from the institutional sector as CME embraces Apple Watch, adds QuikStrike to mobile apps

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

For a number of years, retail FX brokerages have become absolutely reliant on mobile technology in order to engage traders and drive volumes up by removing the static nature of trading platforms and placing the ability to trade into the hands of users at all times.

Due to its very nature, the institutional and commercial trading sector has not followed suit, largely due to the nature of the business in which professional traders, working for large companies which employ HFT and algorithmic practices to trade proprietary accounts sit at desks in the heartlands of Chicago or New York.

Many proprietary trading companies and professional investment managers operate in a manner that is completely contrary to the way in which retail trading is conducted, that being that instead of encouraging trading at all times regardless of location, firms which employ traders often ensure that the traders do not access the systems outside of their working hours, thus negating any need for mobile platforms.

Research conducted by Andrew Saks-McLeod three years ago demonstrated very little drive toward the development of mobile institutional platforms which offer full trading functionality for this exact reason, and the professionals of Chicago and New York often relied on mobile platforms for data aggregation, messaging and analyses, using third party solutions such as Thomson Reuters Eikon, or Bloomberg Terminal.

CME Group looking toward empowering retail traders?

Today, things are somewhat different, especially with regard to how the large exchange technology companies and derivatives venues such as CME Group Inc (NASDAQ:CME) are now actively furthering the development of fully functional mobile devices, with every trading functionality integrated into multi-device platforms for handheld tablets, smartphones and wearable technology.

Why would CME Group develop full trading functionality for Apple Watch and tablets? Both devices are the preserve of retail traders, not employees of proprietary trading firms or algo traders.

It may well be worthy of consideration that CME Group is another institutional venue looking to further its reach toward retail traders.

Two weeks ago, at the FinTech Exchange 2016 event in Chicago’s institutional electronic trading heartlands, a very distinct pattern had become evident in that companies across the entire spectrum, from market data to trading platforms connected to North America’s most prominent venues, retail customers are well and truly on the agenda.

CME Group’s new addition to its product range as of today, includes the company’s QuikStrike set of options valuation tools to the company’s mobile applications.

graphic-apple-watch

The QuikStrike tools, which include data on active strikes, volatility, open settlement, commitment of traders and open interest profile, are now fully live on Android and iOS devices, and can be syncronized with CME Group’s Apple Watch application.

Taking a look at the way in which CME Group angles its Apple Watch application toward its audience, further allusion to developing its retail audience is apparent.

Whilst trading cannot be performed from the watch, only from the mobile or desktop devices, CME Group specifically points out that the rationale behind the Apple Watch application is to provide updates on portfolios without checking a handheld device. This language is clearly aimed firmly at retail traders with exchange traded options portfolios.

As America’s giants continue to innovate, technology and access to trading environments that have until recently been the preserve of the professional are now increasingly making it into the hands (or onto the wrists!) of retail traders.

Images courtesy of CME Group

The post Mobile-led retail platform technology from the institutional sector as CME embraces Apple Watch, adds QuikStrike to mobile apps appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Divisa Capital’s new design: CEO Mushegh Tovmasyan and the executive team explain all

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Veteran Prime-of-Prime Broker Divisa Capital recently relaunched its brand under a new logo and complete web redesign. FinanceFeeds took this opportunity to catch up with the Divisa Capital team in their London HQ yesterday to hear first-hand the motives behind this move.

Mushegh Tovmasyan, CEO of the firm, explained “The Divisa Capital brand, established in 2008, has become a significant player in the FX industry. Divisa has managed to provide excellent liquidity and technology solutions to a rapidly growing client base.

“What started as a single niche brokerage has quickly become a multinational brokerage group of companies expanding in emerging market regions and diverse clientele. However, the different Divisa brands and products made it difficult to effectively communicate the strengths of Divisa Capital to existing and potential clients.”

mushegh

Mushegh Tovmasyan

“In early 2016 we decided that we needed to address the firm’s marketing message, and therefore began a rebranding exercise that resulted in a new website and logo.” Mr Tovmasyan continued. “We moved away from the traditional FX WordPress design structure and towards an inhouse designed proprietary system. This gave us much more scope to capture and convey the firm’s key products and values.”

New products, new execution model

To understand more about the new market message, we spoke to Gary Dennison, Managing Director of the Group’s US office, “We found that clients wanted a clear message under a consolidated brand that encompasses all of Divisa Capital’s products and global companies.

“We were eager to avoid the marketing ploys by some brokers to misuse industry terminology for their benefit, and rather focus on concisely presenting our core offerings” continued Mr. Tovmasyan.

Divisa Capital has long operated as a bespoke Prime-of-Prime broker for margin FX, Precious Metals and CFD solutions for brokers and professional clients. Under the new branding, the firm has expanded on their new core product range to include otcXchange and Divisa Money.

FinanceFeeds asked the team to expand on their core products. “otcXchange offers spot FX liquidity via a powerful ECN”  said Ryan Gagne, Head of US Sales.

Ryan divisa

Ryan Gagne

“By allowing clients with top-tier prime brokers to trade anonymously with a unique liquidity pool and best-of-market execution.” Mr. Gagne continued. “As our margin clients grow in capacity, otcXchange is the natural step up in their corporate evolution.”

“Divisa Money deals with our clients’ pain of having to deal in multiple currencies but have to account their bottom line in one currency. We found that providing them with a physical exchange service with favourable FX rates can increase profitability and reduce FX risks” Mr. Gagne further explained.

International growth

Emerging markets also appeared to be on top of the marketing agenda. “We chose to translate the website into Chinese and Russian to cater for an influx of clientele from these markets. The acquisition of an Armenian Central Bank licensed broker in late 2015 has given unlimited access to the Eurasian region” detailed Arik Oslerne, General Counsel at Divisa Capital. “This has meant having to expand language capabilities in our global support team”.

We asked the Divisa Capital team what was next in the pipeline. Mr. Tovmasyan concluded by saying that “The FX industry is going through a dramatic change in terms of regulation as brokers face increasing costs, capital requirements and red tape.”

“As clients navigate through this turbulence, we expect that doing business in the UK/EU will only become more convoluted with time. Of course, with turbulence comes opportunity, and we are continuously looking at ways to help clients deal with such changes and reduce their costs” concluded Mr. Tovmasyan.

The post Divisa Capital’s new design: CEO Mushegh Tovmasyan and the executive team explain all appeared first on FinanceFeeds.


The rapid increase in interest in exchange-traded FX makes its way to London

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

The expansion and development within the exchange-traded FX sector has taken a massive upturn this year, with some of Chicago’s largest exchange technology firms and derivatives venues looking closely at connecting to platforms which empower the retail trader and allow access to an execution method that had until recently been the preserve of the large institutional desks.

An interesting development has taken place, in which the movement toward exchange-traded FX has now arrived on the other side of the Atlantic, as former interbank FX executive Peter Jerrom and institutional FX specialist John Burt have joined RJ O’Brien in London as Senior Vice Presidents in the company’s listed (exchange-traded) FX brokerage operations.

Mr. Burt joins the company after a year and a half at Sigma Broking as Head of Global FX Exchange-based Products, the penultimate position in a 14 year institutional career.

Before joining Sigma Broking, Mr. Burt spent a year at British interdealer broker ICAP in the emerging market and G10 currency futures division, where he executed trades on and off exchange.

Positions at Sunrise, Tullett Prebon, Swiss interdealer broker Tradition and UBS Investment Bank date back to Mr. Burt’s inaugural position in 2002.

Similarly, Mr. Jerrom joins RJ O’Brien from Sigma Broking, where he spent a year and a half as Desk Head for the FX division, responsible for execution on an OTC basis and via CME Group on both the buy and sell side.

Mr. Jerrom’s career also involves almost 5 years at UniCredit Markets & Investment Banking, where he was Managing Director and Global Head of FX Derivatives, based in London, where he managed G10 and CEEMA teams in London, New York, Hong Kong, Munich and Vienna.

Almost a decade at major banks preceded Mr. Jerrom’s tenure at UniCredit, beginning in 1998 where he was an Associate at Citigroup for 5 years, which led to 4 years at Barclays Capital at Vice President level, before becoming Head of FX Exotics at Lehman Brothers until the firm’s demise in October 2008.

David Mudie, Chief Executive Officer of RJO Europe, today made a corporate statement:

“Peter and John are seasoned FX brokers and terrific additions to the team here, reinforcing our commitment to client-focused, best-in-class service. We continue to expand and round out our institutional specialty areas from the UK, and this represents our first London-based emphasis on exchange-traded FX. It’s a great complement to our growing global over-the-counter FX business that Tony Dalton is heading from New York.”

Indeed, the drive to invest more resources into exchange-traded FX in North America has been apparent for some time, however this initiative by RJ O’Brien demonstrates that it is not just the preserve of Chicago’s dedicated platform providers that wish to take their services to a wider audience.

Photograph: Downtown Chicago. Copyright FinanceFeeds

The post The rapid increase in interest in exchange-traded FX makes its way to London appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

The state of retail FX: An in-depth debate

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Where are we going?

In the highly competitive electronic trading world, how can the entire business evolve, be more sustainable, and create an environment in which companies offering diversified services can prosper.

What is being done right, and what is being overlooked, and how can brokers, technology vendors, marketing specialists and ancillary service providers adapt rapidly to an ever-changing landscape which is constantly pushing the boundaries of innovation?

Most importantly, how can the increasing demands of a global client base be met?

Andrew Saks-McLeod speaks to senior industry executive Paul Orford at Epsilon in Limassol Marina, which is at the center of the retail FX industry heartlands of Limassol, Cyprus, to debate this in great detail.

Photograph: Limassol Marina, Cyprus. Copyright FinanceFeeds

The post The state of retail FX: An in-depth debate appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Deliverable FX is the preserve of institutional giants: Sucden Financial’s Falgun Khamar takes a close look

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

The deliverable FX companies which provide direct foreign currency transfers and settlements across the length and breadth of the globe form a vast part of the financial landscape in today’s world of international business which requires settlement in multiple currencies.

Additionally, the vast increase in worldwide travel by all manner of individuals which range from corporate executives and heads of large entities to students enjoying a post-graduate trip around the world.

Many companies in the deliverable FX sector are huge, with electronic systems that can process invoices in foreign currency as well as provide transfers which are made in a local currency, and delivered in a local currency in a different country.

Falgun Khamar_001

Falgun Khamar

An interesting point is that the dramatic growth in this sector, which includes international firms such as MoneyGram, Travelex, and Western Union operate in such a separate business environment to the FX brokerages in the electronic trading sector that the paths do not cross in any shape or form.

This is the case as far as the actual service providers to end users are concerned, but what about the wider operational components?

At that level, the electronic trading industry and the deliverable FX businesses share common ground, and services are provided by liquidity companies which are veritable giants in the prime brokerage and non-bank liquidity business.

Today, FinanceFeeds spoke to Falgun Khamar, FX Sales Trader at Sucden Financial in order to take a very close look at how large institutional businesses provide service to deliverable FX companies.

Please elaborate on the history of deliverable FX within Sucden Financial and how Sucden Financial gained a presence in this field, and where the company stands against retail providers in London

Sucden Financial is well established in FX and has supplied deliverable/physical foreign exchange for over 30 years. Our clients include money service businesses (MSBs)/commercial FX providers, who in turn deal with companies and individuals wishing to exchange foreign currency.

The market has historically been dominated by a small number of large banks. We identified a gap and over the last few years have increased our efforts to capture a greater market share. Sucden Financial is not a bank and does not compete with retail providers. The technological advances of FinTec payment providers mean we are a strong fit to assist with these firms, especially in their initial growth stages.

Talk us through how Sucden Financial’s Deliverable FX system works, including aspects such as the offsetting of margins in which currency can be bought and sold with no margin requirement, and how the entire business is structured from voice brokerage right through to API connectivity for electronic participants.

We assist money service businesses by being able to provide an all-round service, with pricing from multiple participants. This is accessed via our online trading platform or API, where a client effectively plugs in their own trading system to our infrastructure.

Andrew Fox_001

Andy Fox

Our deliverable FX offering is designed to make it as simple as possible for our clients, from the moment clients execute a trade online or over the phone, up to when we transfer funds back to our clients.

We offer an all-round service for FX money service businesses with same day payments, forward lines for up to two years and provide the option to drawdown when required.

Our clients are assigned their own account manager. This personal touch helps us to fully understand their needs and requirements to ensure they take full advantage of Sucden Financial’s wide range of capabilities.

What are the main advantages of using Sucden Financial over banks?

One of our many advantages is that forward margins are netted on offsetting trades against all currency pairs. This results in a significant benefit to our clients through freeing up margin requirements and their trading limits. Together with a personal service and tight and deep aggregated prices, our offering is highly attractive.

In conclusion, Andy Fox, Head of FX at Sucden Financial added “Deliverable FX has been an important part of Sucden Financial’s FX offering for over 30 years. We see this as a growth area for the future, fitting in well with the firm’s diversified business model.”

The post Deliverable FX is the preserve of institutional giants: Sucden Financial’s Falgun Khamar takes a close look appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Michael Davies becomes Head of eFX Sales at Sucden Financial

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Among senior industry figures within the institutional FX and prime brokerage sector, some highly talented and very experienced professional stand out.

One such executive is Michael Davies, who today has been promoted to Head of eFX Sales for the EMEA region at Sucden Financial in London.

Mr. Davies joined Sucden over 10 years ago as an analyst, and moved into the company’s eFX division in 2011.

michael-davies_001

Michael Davies

As the eFX division of the company has evolved, Mr. Davies has been instrumental in not only assembling the team which maintains a reputation as a pinnacle among London’s giants, and has also grown a global client base of retail brokerages which include some very long established and well recognized firms.

Indeed, Mr. Davies is a reference point for this particular sector of the industry, his extensive knowledge standing him in good stead for this leadership position.

Making a commercial statement on Mr. Davies’ appointment, Michael Overlander, Chief Executive of Sucden Financial stated

“Michael has been instrumental in establishing and growing our e-FX team and his promotion is very much deserved.”

Mr. Davies said of his elevation to Head of eFX Sales EMEA

“Sucden Financial has a great eFX offering, with a 100% STP model, established bank relationships, a strong balance sheet, and over 40 years of experience in the financial markets. We are in a strong position for continued growth and, as part of my new role I plan to continue our focus on emerging markets as well as key territories such as London, where it appears there is a surge in new brokerages establishing themselves.”

FinanceFeeds wishes Mr. Davies great success in leading the eFX division of Sucden Financial.

The post Michael Davies becomes Head of eFX Sales at Sucden Financial appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Anonymous liquidity + decentralized currency = complete independence. Disruptive or innovative?

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Regulatory attention surrounding the provision of dark liquidity by banks and liquidity providers in the interbank sector to the commercial realms of proprietary trading companies which use algorithmic automated execution to get in or out of trades quicker than counterparts has been a moot point over the last 2 years.

On one hand, Australia recognizes dark liquidity, commonly referred to as ‘dark pools’ as part of the financial landscape, the island nation’s strong economic base and richness in minerals having made it a very important center for commodities trading, and its financial regulations overseen by ASIC requiring companies to meet some of the highest criteria in the world.

However dark liquidity, which by definition is a private forum for trading secuities in which the trades remain confidential and outside of the purview of the general investing public, has remained very much legitimate.

The European Commission takes a dim view of dark pools, however UBS, a Swiss bank, operates the second largest dark pool in the US.

America’s institutional and large proprietary trading industry, largely centered in Chicago, is so established and well organized that dark liquidity has become a major component, however today, an advancement of the technological kind has headed onto the scene.

Bitcoin exchange Kraken has become the first and only exchange to offer clients Ether (ETH) Dark Pool trading, making the virtual currency not only completely independent of exchanges and central banks worldwide, but also the trading of the currency anonymous.

Back in the days of the initial foray into the market made by Bitcoin-related enterprises and marketplaces, anonymity had gained something of a reputation as a taboo subject.

The introduction of Kraken’s Ether Dark Pool is parallel to the rise in popularity of ether, according to Kraken.

Kraken estimates that ether is the second most valuable form of cryptocurrency behind only bitcoin (XBT), with a current market capitalization of over $700 million. Since the beginning of 2016, ether’s value has risen approximately ten times.

While Kraken has offered dark pool trading for bitcoin since June last year, CEO Jesse Powell said now was the perfect time to add an Ether Dark Pool to Kraken’s leading range of services for digital asset traders.

“Kraken is proud to be the first exchange to provide clients with a Dark Pool for ether, a strategic option for professional traders. This year, trading volume for ether has dramatically increased on Kraken’s exchange, and we developed the Ether Dark Pool to bridge the gap between our lit order books and over-the-counter desk,” said Mr. Powell.

“Dark Pool trading allows for orders to be placed out of sight so that traders can make large buy or sell orders (minimum of 50 bitcoin or 2,500 ether) without revealing their sentiment to other traders. Advantages include reduced market impact and better price for large blocks,” Mr. Powell added in a commercial statement.

Kraken clients will now have access to 6 ether dark pool currency pairs, with the option to exchange ether for bitcoin (ETH/XBT.d), euro (ETH/EUR.d), United States dollar (ETH/USD.d), Canadian dollar (ETH/CAD.d), pound sterling (ETH/GBP.d), and Japanese yen (ETH/JPY.d). As with other Kraken dark pools, the Ether Dark Pool trading fees range from 0.20% to 0.36%, depending on trade volume.

Separately, today Kraken announced major enhancements to their industry leading Margin Trading program, with increased leverage for ETH/XBT (up from 2.5x to 4x) and the addition of support to three pairs: ETH/EUR, XBT/USD and ETH/USD, all with up to 3x leverage. Ether will also become a margin currency, meaning that now a client’s ETH balance can be used (in addition to XBT, EUR, and USD) as collateral for the advanced (borrowed) funds tied to a leveraged margin trade. Margin trading remains unavailable to US residents at this time.

Mr. Powell added, “The details get technical but there are two important takeaways when it comes to dark pool and margin trading. If traders are looking to move large sizes without affecting the market, they trade dark on Kraken. If traders want to keep fewer assets on account and they want less exposure to funding delays, they trade with margin on Kraken. These services together with our OTC desk reflect the growing professionalism of our client base and our exchange.”

The significant additions of Ether Dark Pool trading and enhancements to Kraken’s Margin Trading Program come one week after Kraken’s new Position Settlement feature went live on May 4. Position Settlement allows clients to return the advanced (borrowed) funds tied to a leveraged margin trade and close a position by sourcing the funds from their own account balance. Previously only available on Kraken manually, Position Settlement is now a free, automated service which eliminates the impact of funding latency on trading.

The post Anonymous liquidity + decentralized currency = complete independence. Disruptive or innovative? appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Sending out emails containing material information could cost you $900,000

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

In North America, the way that material non-public information is handled by trading companies and research analysts within private equity and institutional sales and trading firms is a very serious matter.

It is relatively common practice to serve information to interested potential clients and existing customers with regard to news relating to companies whose stock in which they may have an interest in investing, and ‘flash’ emails is one method often used to maximize reach.

One particular company, Stephens Inc, of Little Rock, Arkansas, has been issued a fine of $900,000 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for what the authority considers to be an oversight which created the risk that these flash emails could potentially include materiall non-public information that may be misused by sales and trading personnel.

As an additional aspect, Stephens Inc will cease the distribution of flash emails, and was ordered by FINRA to implement a plan to conduct a comprehensive review of its policies, procedures and training in the research area.

This is particularly interesting as many retail FX companies have considered that operating a research and analytics team which analyzes the market and in some cases actually distribute data to clients.

With regard to currencies, there is very little risk indeed because the internal affairs or performance of companies which are the subject of investment and could influence prices is not relevent.

With stocks, equities and indices, however, which are continually being added to many FX trading companies’ range of products, this would be a different matter and this action by FINRA sets a precedent.

In this particular case, Stephens’ company-wide flash email program was designed as an expeditious way for research analysts to share publicly available news and insights regarding covered companies with its sales and trading personnel for discussion with firm customers interested in those companies.

FINRA conducted an inspection of Stephens Inc’s operations and found instances of the company’s personnel forwarding flash emails marked “internal use only” to customers, or cutting and pasting the text of an internal-use email into a separate communication sent to a customer.

In at least one instance, FINRA also found that content from an unapproved, draft research report was cut and pasted into a flash email. Although these practices were contrary to firm policy, FINRA found that the firm lacked effective monitoring or supervisory systems to detect or prevent them.

Making a public statement this week on the matter, Brad Bennett, FINRA’s Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, said

“The supervision of internal communications by research analysts to the sales force requires extreme vigilance given the possibility of revealing material nonpublic information in advance of published research. Today’s action reminds those firms that permit such communications of the need to supervise and monitor them, and to ensure that their controls protect against trading based on the information.”

Should this now become a point of focus for the regulators, ‘call to action’ emails could well become a thing of the past.

The post Sending out emails containing material information could cost you $900,000 appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

The wolf in sheep’s clothing: HFT is not the preserve of retail traders, but its institutional usage is affecting liquidity

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Two years ago, many industry executives in retail FX brokerages, as well as specialist liquidity providers, platform companies and connectivity firms had focused a significant amount of attention on high frequency trading, or HFT as it is often referred to in its three-letter acronym form.

Discussions within bank desks, through to the boardrooms of some of the world’s largest non-bank dealers had opinions on the increasing use of high frequency trading practices within the proprietary trading desks of Chicago, as well as those connected remotely via colocated servers to venues in Australia, Japan and Singapore.

The attention of the regulators was attracted, and Germany, a nation with very little electronic financial markets activity compared to the powerhouses of London and Chicago, was the first to show concerns with regard to high frequency trading within its jurisdiction, as the regulator invoked a High Frequency Trading Act which went into force in May 2013, covering supervision, risk controls, limiting the order-to-trade ratio and tick size, and ordering venues to flag all electronic and algorithmically generated orders with a unique key when sent to a German exchange – and perhaps most of all, the implementation of strict rules regarding market manipulation.

High frequency news analytics services had begun to give institutional traders an edge by speeding up reaction times to new information, and BaFIN’s view on potential market disruption that this can cause when connected to a low latency execution system, led the way toward the US authorities and the European Commission to take a look at whether to put a complete stop to it.

High speed news + low latency connection = disruption or progress?

Institutional traders in financial markets had been increasingly sourcing information from ‘sentiment’ indicators; analytics created by computer algorithms from real-time content published by Dow Jones Newswires, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters and other wire services.

These indicators can tell traders within milliseconds whether an article is positive or negative and whether it contains relevant information affecting the value of an asset, as well as giving a trader the ability to connect to a very low latency system which can outpace that of a standard retail trading environment, confident that the high frequency analytics will keep up with the speed of the trading system and therefore provide an advantage via ‘latency arbitrage.’

The Dodd-Frank Act’s introduction in 2010 included the “Volcker Rule” which was named after veteran American economist Paul Volcker, which sought to ban proprietary trading which takes place outside of banks. This was set to change the entire landscape of Chicago’s prop desks, however when it was invoked, it outlawed proprietary trading by non-bank institutions by any instrument except for OTC derivatives.

Australia, land of plenty, rich in minerals and as a result home to a massive and highly profitable commodities trading industry, largely centered around minerals, took the view that HFT and the use of algorithms is part of the financial landscape. Astute regulator ASIC is renowned for ensuring a very high quality financial markets economy, however it sees no issue with algos.

All gone quiet…  but has it?

Despite the ongoing advancement of the retail FX trading environment, HFT and the use of algorithmic solutions in the same form that they are used by commercial desks are two facets that have not made their way into the hands of retail customers as yet, and apart from a few specialist systems which emulate the colocation of servers that commercial companies go to great expense in order to achieve, the entire HFT discussion has gone quiet among the boardrooms of the retail giants, technology vendors and ancillary service providers in the same way as it has done within the offices of the regulators.

During 2009 and pre-Dodd Frank 2010, approximately 60% to 70% of U.S. trading was attributed to HFT, though that percentage has declined in the last few years.

Why this perhaps should be brought onto the main stage yet again is that although the use of HFT and algorithms in professional settings has declined by a small amount, it is still there and it is perhaps worth considering that although it has remained the preserve of the corporate trading world and has not filtered into retail, today’s difficulties with liquidity relationships for brokerages and non-bank liquidity providers is not just down to the counterparty credit risk issue that blights the entire business currently.

A combination of difficulties obtaining credit for spot transactions on an OTC basis and the effect that HFT has on liquidity provision should be a current situation to bear in mind.

In terms of less liquid assets such as stocks, liquidity is measured during the five secodns after the release of a news item is lower for articles accurately portrayed as being of high relevance than for high-relevance articles originally released as low-relevance.

This suggests that while trading on news analytics improves the informational efficiency of stock prices, the fact that only a subset of market participants has access to news sentiments indicators increases information asymmetry in the market.

Two years ago, online international business school INSEAD conducted a study with regard to how the risks of high speed analytics can affect everything from price to liquidity.

At the time, the researchers looked at both Ravenpack’s initial and corrected analysis taken from the Dow Jones articles (the initial analysis being largely “written” by algorithms, while the corrected version is edited by a human).

Effect on volume and liquidity – Prop trading institutions use advantageous methods, FXPBs pay the price.

Two important findings were that market news articles recognized early as being of high relevance triggered a significantly greater ratio of trade volume for the asset within the first five seconds compared to news releases which ere initially but inaccurately being regarded to be of low importance.

Translate that into today’s environment, in which banks, themselves making losses, are looking to reduce the risk that they take by providing Tier 1 liquidity directly to non-bank prime brokerages , with a total risk weight for probability of default having been calculated at 56.60% by across the entire interbank FX dealers as part of a study by Citigroup last month, and it displays another obstacle to overcome, which this time is absolutely not the creation of the retail FX world, but a byproduct of the institutional closed desk environments.

The post The wolf in sheep’s clothing: HFT is not the preserve of retail traders, but its institutional usage is affecting liquidity appeared first on FinanceFeeds.


Perspective: Invast Securities Director of Institutional Sales Geoff Last says “FX liquidity keeps changing”

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

The continually advancing and evolving nature of the provision of FX liquidity is of great interest to many brokerages and non-bank prime brokerages alike, and indeed many of the giants among electronic trading firms are beginning to place their opinions on this matter.

Today, Geoff Last, Director of Institutional Sales at Invast Securities in Australia has provided his perspective to FinanceFeeds.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAZpAAAAJDI5ZGFhZmJjLWIwZTYtNGY0MS05MmYzLWZmNGE0NmJjYTYzMQ

Geoff Last

“In all my years of foreign exchange I’ve never known the pools of liquidity to change so often” said Mr. Last.

“Some of this is brought about by banks proprietary desks closing,taking on less risk, as well as regulatory requirements having an impact, and we are also seeing an emergence of non bank liquidity filling the void. Some are hedge funds others are pure algorithmic trading systems with little human intervention” he said.

“Amazingly spreads have remained consistent or is this just an illusion?” – Geoff Last, Director of Institutional Sales, Invast Securities.

Mr. Last considers that banks taking less risk means offloading risk and therefore pricing can become fragmented for a very short period of time. Price sensitivity is the new norm among some banks now as they slowly become agency models.

With regard to how Invast is handling the need to adapt and provide up to date institutional liquidity to its clients, Mr. Last said “At Invast Global we have made adjustments to allow our clients the flexibility to execute trades with our liquidity resources. PurePrime and PureFX are Invast Global products that allow LP selectivity whether you are an experienced trader, HFT, hedge fund, proprietary trading firm or retail broker.”

Mr. Last, who has 39 years of experience in the electronic trading and interbank FX industry, having begun his career in 1977 as an FX Trader at Commercial Bank of Australia before progressing to executive positions in esteemed institutions, explained “I have noticed some substantial changes over recent years, which I have often referenced back to how things were when I began in the 1970s.”

“I had worked with phone broking in the early days and it has stemmed from that. I was a trader, and in my day there was 6 brokers, most of which were voice brokers, and at that time not every one had the same pricing. They were different and each one was important within the currency pairs that it specialized in” explained Mr. Last.

“An important point to consider when looking at the foundation of this side of the business is that this same specialization still exists today within the bank and liquidity pools in that some may be stronger in their currency pairs” he said.

“Some of hte banks have now pulled out of the market because they cannot compete in that space, a matter that was largely to do with priority desks that were taking the risks and they have now farmed this out. Algo and non-bank market makes are now filling that void” – Geoff Last, Director of Institutional Sales, Invast Global.

Liquidity void to be filled by non-banks and hedge funds?

Mr. Last explained that in his opinion, going forward, we will be left with alot of non-banks or hedge funds, which will come in and fill the void, and because the provision of liquidity in electronic trading is so highly technical these days, everyone wants fast millisecond execution therefore the key is going to be the IT side of it. “I don’t think the banks that are scaling down their businesses want to invest in that technology” he said.

“Where we make a difference is that we at Invast Global offer our cusotmers transparency about who they want to use in terms of non banks and banks. We don’t just give them a stream, instead we customize their liquidity.”

“We may have, for example, a high freqency trader as a customer, and not all banks want to take this business because not all want to take this type of flow so we go to other institutions, for example a non-bank,and they would be receptive to taking that flow” explained Mr. Last.

In the old days, top of book feeds reigned

Mr. Last drew on his experience, looking back at how liquidity was provided some years ago and how today’s requirements are different. “In the old days, it was a case of giving brokerages a feed at top of book and everyone wins. Now it is going toward specialist non banks or banks which angle their services to specific requirements of customers.”

“There are some agentcy banks that don’t want to hold risk and so they pass it through, which can upset cusotmers that want to trade a larger amounts, therefore we go to institutions that would warehouse the flow so that a larger order flow can be handled discreetly with less detrimental price movement” – Geoff Last, Director of Institutional Sales, Invast Global.

Mr. Last further explained “We have a very strong prime broker arrangement with many firms which enables us to marry up with our liquidity providers that we can offer the service to.”

“We offer liquidity providers the service, and they connnect to brokerages. We are a Tier 1 broker with strong capitalization that can offer front line execution rather than being a prime of prime.”

Institutional client onboarding = less costly

“At Invast Global, we are completely different from our parent company. Here in Australia, we are more focused on institutonal business” said Mr. Last.

“The cost of acquiring an institutional client is very different to the challenges that retail brokerages face, as it takes a lot more time and is far more resoruce hungry to identify and establish an institutional client, to find out what they need from us, however once the client is on board, it is just one client, and the relationship is very much longer. In the retail sector, it costs a lot of money to bring on board clients, and the number of clients that are needed is far higher, therefore it costs a lot more to make money out of retail customers” said Mr. Last.

“We deal with retail brokers who don’t have the capitalization to maintain their own prime services, so we work with them to find the best execution for their clients, whether they take the next step and do the STP is a consideration, and I am sure that many have clients which do big volume and don’t want to take that risk cna pass through to us.”

Conclusion

Mr. Last concluded by explaining that “With many proprietary trading desks selling down, new technology has allwoed those who worked on such prop desks to open their own shops. It is not so difficult these days to open a small hedge fund, for example.”

“Many of these entities do not have the capital behind them to receive a prime brokerage relationship so we can fill the void there too. From a previous position at a trading desk within a bank, a person can step in an say that he wants specific banks and specific services to run his fund. It’s part of the shift from trader to hedge fund.”

“I tend to think that if I was a trader still, what would I like on the receiving end? This is how we lead in developing customized services for relationships with commercial clients.”

The post Perspective: Invast Securities Director of Institutional Sales Geoff Last says “FX liquidity keeps changing” appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Saxo Bank’s new Australian CEO elaborates on four initial priorities; Emphasis on institutional expansion

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

This morning, Saxo Capital Markets, the wholly owned subsidiary of technology-led electronic trading company Saxo Bank appointed Ben Smoker as CEO of its Australian division.

Saxo Capital Markets made its inaugural entry into Australia in 2012, and the appointment of Mr. Smoker to lead the operations today gives Saxo Capital Markets an industry executive with over 30 years institutional bank and non-bank experience.

FinanceFeeds spoke to Mr. Smoker today in order to establish four key areas which he intends to further within the initial part of his leadership.

The strategic step for the business is to increase the emphasis in the institutional business in Australia. How will this be done?

Saxo is committed to providing institutional clients and their end customers with multi-asset execution, prime brokerage and market-leading trading technology. From a global perspective, the Saxo institutional offering is core to the Group’s strategic direction going forward and it makes sense for us to make it our focus here locally in Australia leveraging our global strengths.

20acd48Which institutional segment is Saxo trying to address now?

Fintech disruption is impacting the Financial Services industry at a rapid pace. Saxo is well placed to provide services to a variety of institutional segments. We aim to be servicing both the ‘disruptors’ and the ‘disrupted’ including retail banks, brokers, advisers and asset managers and the evolving robo-advisory space.

Our main goal in the institutional space is to facilitate and augment existing and new institutional client business models by leveraging the innovative pallet of global markets trading technology Saxo has at its disposal.

What type of institutional clients is more likely to engage with the Open API solutions?

The Saxo Open API is designed to capture a wide universe of institutional clients as it has the flexibility to support custom integration requirements across a multitude of asset classes. In particular we’ve seen an increasing demand for high quality liquidity provision and multi-asset execution – two areas where Saxo is undeniably a market leader.

Are there any other specific services Saxo will be emphasizing?

Aside from the Open API offering, the Saxo FX Direct Market Access and Prime Brokerage capabilities are two institutional services that we are keen to promote here locally in Australia. Additionally, the Saxo International Equities execution capability is a pre-eminent offering globally and we see the potential for strong local demand for this in the Australian marketplace.

Photograph: Saxo Bank, Hellerup, Denmark. Copyright FinanceFeeds

The post Saxo Bank’s new Australian CEO elaborates on four initial priorities; Emphasis on institutional expansion appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Face to face, Skype, Messenger or conference call? It’s good to talk, but better to meet! – Op Ed

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

Sitting in front of clients, or en route to a meeting in a different region of the world, many a colleague during my 25 years in the electronic trading industry has pondered the equation of cost of traveling, often long distance by plane, to meet new institutional clients, high net worth individuals, or introducing brokers.

It is certainly true that in my inaugural years as a PBX switch engineer for bank trading desks which I commenced in 1991, global relationships were not part of my scope, it was not long before they were. Two years later, I founded a solutions consultancy which is where the need for long distance communication began.

A global business, and indeed a global, internet-dependent, technologically centered business, the FX industry relies on an international audience which can be reached via many different models, however which is the most effective in terms of the cost of maintaining good relationships and understanding what critical partners need?

Conference calls

On the face of it, conference calls appear to be highly effective as they do not remove key personnel from their daily responsibilities for longer than the actual meeting itself, there are no long flights which can write off a day’s work, and there are no costs associated with travel.

The downsides however, can be deal breakers as conference calls to potential new partners can be impersonal, often lead to no action – I often find that an activity that has not required investment of time and resources from both sides is likely to be less of a priority for both parties than one in which a vested interest or capital outlay is a factor – and, well, this:

Whilst some smaller deals with lower volume introducing brokers can be done via conference calling, all of the communication barriers that Tripp & Troy rather amusingly detail in this video exist, and the true potential can never be achieved.

A few years ago, when retail FX brokerages began to focus their attentions on mainland China’s array of introducing brokers which proliferate the second tier development towns, many retail brokers looking to increase their volume and decrease their customer onboarding costs employed Chinese speaking staff in organic desks to call and onboard partners.

At that time, a widely held misconception was that many introducers of business were required in China because each one was a small entity that may refer just a handful of clients.

Meeting = knowledge. Knowledge = power

An investigation by FinanceFeeds across China’s development towns including Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Zhengzhou, Guangdong, Chengdu and Shijiazhuang revealed that many introducing brokers and portfolio managers in those regions were each producing 90,000 lots per month on average, and had offices which resemble those of a successful FX brokerage with full facilities.

A look at the corporate structures of these offices demonstrated that the long-standing relationships with retail brokerages to which the firms refer business revealed that those which made the continued effort to visit and nurture the business were those who were receiving long term order flow.

Back in 2004, Lubomir Kaneti joined FXDD as VP Operations, before becoming COO in May 2007.

From the company’s headquarters in New York, Mr. Kaneti was instrumental in establishing global partnerships, and to this day, FXDD has vast prominence in China to the point at which it could be considered that the company’s Chinese business has been instrumental to FXDD’s core business.

I met with Mr. Kaneti at FXDD’s New York headquarters, where Mr. Kaneti explained the company’s continued visits to introducers in China in order to foster relations, which solidified very long standing partnerships.

Through a great deal of research and meetings with IBs in China, FinanceFeeds clearly understands the need for brokers to which said IBs are referring business engage on a personal basis with the IBs by spending time with them, at their offices and listening to their requirements.

Whilst Mr. Kaneti firmly agrees with this, he considers there to be far more to the art of ensuring that a smooth and long term partnership can be fostered. “It is not just a case of traveling to see IBs” he said.

“The IBs have to promote their brand whilst adhering to the very stringent rules in China. They may push the limit here & there and we will call them if we see something not right to ensure that we can help them operate within the appropriate limits across the entire chain. Overall we have been very good to them and that is critical. In China, companies appreciate this kind of very detailed service.”

Entrepreneurship is paramount in China

Mr. Kaneti has a very concise understanding of the modus operandi of Chinese IBs. “The Chinese IBs are entrepreneurs in their own right, and respect companies that let them focus on building their business. They need to focus on building their network and developing more business, whilst the broker has to be reliable in delivering a comprehensive brokerage service that does not impede the IB’s goals and allows them to concentrate on their business.”

“You don’t have to be the latest and greatest, but you have to be serious and provide top quality service, and build trust. The IBs are very keen and actively looking to sell a specific premium brand to their customers, therefore it becomes easier to do so as it becomes a well known brand in China if the company provides good quality customer service.”

In terms of gaining trust, Mr. Kaneti considers it to be rather like growing a traditional British garden. “The similarity is that after several years of cultivation and attention, an immaculate lawn will result, but after the lawn has been completed, you have to go back over the parts that have already grown and ensure that no weeds have appeared, and then plant some flowers to show additional attention to detail.”

Quite clearly, a high touch model is important in China. Is this the case elsewhere? – Sort of !

Whilst it is clear that the only way to succeed in China is to foster personal relationships, in other regions, opinions vary.

Plus500 is a case in point. Here is a company with a very small payroll and absolutely no sales team, which by May 2015 had become a firm with a market capitalization of $1 billion. Here is a company which has mastered the world of digital marketing.

On the other hand, British landmarks such as City Index (now owned by GAIN Capital) had expanded their reach purely by cultivating relationships.

Under the leadership of Meir Velenski, City Index took its CFD and spread betting services into Israel, and no advertising or calls took place. Instead, Mr. Velenski encouraged a high touch model in which customers who were high net worth, experienced traders, attended seminars at the company’s offices in Tel Aviv, resulting in a loyal client base of traders who knew the business well, lowering the cost and heightening client lifetime value.

Mr. Velenski now operates his own brokerage, Velenski Financial, and continues to stand by the high touch approach, having regular meetings with clients, service providers and traveling to visit liquidity providers.

Culture eats strategy for breakfast – Peter Drucker

In London, the center of the entire institutional non-bank FX industry (as well as home to most of the interbank prime brokerages), travel is less common because of the inter-institution nature of the city’s financial sector and the proximity of each company within the square mile.

Speaking today to one of London’s experts on the FX, CFD and derivatives trading industry, travel was most certainly off the agenda.

“I think the focus on cost means there’s more pressure to conduct meetings electronically” he said.

If the counterparty is going to be “paying” for the face to face meeting anyway through wider spreads or higher commissions, then again I reckon many are hard nosed enough to forego the personal aspect.

Nauman Anees, CEO of ThinkForex explained “For a true partnership model to thrive, finding quality IB’s is key and building a long term relationship. Sometimes not every IB, White Label Partner or Money Manager is the right fit for a broker, and on paper and conference calls everything sounds good but a face to face meeting goes a long way in aligning everyones interest and building a long term business relationship.”

“Conference calls and Skype are a great way to get a relationship initially going however longer term if the business is good from a IB it makes sense to have a meeting . At ThinkForex I make it a point that we meet with our Key Partners regularily face to face to build a long lasting relationship” concluded Mr. Anees.

In America, relationships certainly matter.

Justin Hertzberg, CEO of Forest Park FX in Boca Raton, Florida explained to me this morning “As much as this industry is about euros and dollars and pounds, it is also about relationships. Where possible, I prefer to meet clients and brokers in person, shake their hand and look them in the eye. For me, five minutes in person is worth more than five months of conference calls.”

Most certainly this translates into the institutional world too. I am a regular visitor to Chicago and New York, and the electronic venues and large firms in both of those major centers rely on longstanding relationships that have been cultivated over several years.

Many retail companies look at using specialist online meeting tools such as Google Hangouts or GoToMeeting, however the use of these is far more prominent among online marketers than it is among institutional service providers or technology vendors.

In conclusion, the decision to spend on executive travel in order to understand client needs and foster the best relationships and provide an edge over the competition is very specific to the requirements and target audience of each company.

From a professional perspective, I can vouch for the absolute value in international travel in order to continue to fully understand the entire ecosystem of this complex industry, especially from a research perspective, which no doubt applies to those providing services to brokers as equally as it does to those providing detailed coverage.

Whilst the technology which commenced with instant messengers such as ICQ, which incidentally was developed by a close member of my family in the early 1990s before it was sold to AOL, has shrunk the world and increased the speed of global business, there is no substitute for the good old fashioned meeting, and in an electronic business such as ours, long may the good relationships continue.

The post Face to face, Skype, Messenger or conference call? It’s good to talk, but better to meet! – Op Ed appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

“The whole industry needs to change”– Debate over de facto execution models as ADS Securities launches true prime of prime

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

There is no doubt that one of the most important matters for the non-bank electronic trading industry this year is access to uninterrupted, good quality liquidity in order to provide best execution to an ever demanding client base.

When bearing in mind the current reluctance of banks to grant credit to OTC FX companies and the risk of default which has been calculated by many Tier 1 banks, themselves going through a period of caution due to low corporate performance, many having reported annual losses during 2015, the ability to provide fluid market access has become an increasing challenge.

Where to go for real prime brokerage relationships at no cost, and why there is a $1.3 trillion gap

Today, FinanceFeeds spoke at length to Marco Baggioli, COO, at ADS Securities in London, who revealed the launch of a new Prime of Prime service which the company is now providing.

In launching its new prime of prime service today in London, ADS Securities understands that following the Swiss National Bank event in January 2015, a number of Tier 1 banks reduced their credit and risk appetites, with Mr. Baggioli having examined this at great length.

Marco 2

Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities LLC

Faced with higher capital requirements, higher costs and reduced profitability, some of these Tier 1 banks stopped providing FX-only prime brokerage services and many others re-evaluated their appetite for sub-Tier 1 clients.

In developing the Prime-of-Prime product offering, ADS Securities saw a unique opportunity to leverage both its strong relationships with existing PBs and its high level of capitalization to offer institutions substantial credit facilities to support their prime brokerage needs.

Mr. Baggioli, an expert in institutional trade execution and prime brokerage relationships, estimates that there is a potential credit gap affecting up to $1.3 trillion in terms of average daily volume that needs to be filled, and that the entire method by which OTC firms conduct their business from the relationships with banks, through liquidity and technology providers and prime brokerages, right down to the retail brokerage needs to be examined in order to overcome this matter, reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of prime brokerage relationships.

“The lack of credit will lead to much wider spreads and increased pricing for all, from banks, to hedge funds, international businesses and all FX traders and, at the moment, no one is facing up to the problem” stated Mr. Baggioli.

Entering further into the discussion in order to examine solutions for this, Mr. Baggioli divides the retail brokerage world into three groups

In explaining how he views the current topography, Mr. Baggioli said “To me , when I look at the retail space, I divide the world into 3 major groups of providers.”

“One group is made up of global players like ADSS, FXCM and Saxo Bank. Those, whether they were hit or not by the Swiss National Bank event in January 2015 tend to have less problems with regard to cost base or PB credit lines” he explained.

“Global brokerages have less problems with their cost base because even if these brokers have retail clients on small tickets, their prime broker allows for very cost effective aggregation of trades. These global players have the ability to keep prime brokerage costs low by not suffering small ticket charges. They do this by putting together the flow of a very large number of clients and give them to their prime brokerage once aggregated usually via Netlink” – Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities LLC

“The second group is made up of purely local retail brokers which are specialists in their own niche market or region, whether it is because of regulations that mean that they cannot go abroad, or it is because everything is in the local language of their market, for example” explained Mr. Baggioli.

ADS London Office (1)

ADS London Office

“This type of company often suffers from very high prime brokerage costs. This is because, for example, if you are a broker in Turkey and offer 24 hour access to clients and trade G5 with liquidity from several different makers, it becomes quite difficult to aggregate throughout the day a relatively small and fragmented flow into a million dollar ticket, or more, to give to your prime broker and avoid surcharges, even during market liquidity hours like London morning.

Let’s say they pay $3 per million, which is competitive, however $3 per million doesn’t apply pro-rata to a $10,000 ticket because small ticket surcharges would kick in below the $1 million mark. The actual cost for that ticket is probably going to be $1.50 because the PB needs to cover CLS costs, hence making the actual per million fee charge on that type of flow $150.” – Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities.

” For these types of companies I would recommend not to go the prime brokerage way, not even the PoP one. It is better for that type of retail brokers to go to a global provider like ADS Securities and take our liquidity in aggregated form instead. We have access to about 80 feeds from bank and non-bank providers as well as from ECNs in one package with no PB costs at all; our retail broker client can chose what LPs the want to add to the pool and we can save them 100% of the prime brokerage costs, whilst providing the same level of best execution they are getting today”.

James Watson CEO ADS London (1) - Copy

James Watson CEO ADS London

“The third group is the one made of medium size retail brokers whose business is large enough to cost effectively pay for a PB relationship but whose balance sheet falls short of the minimum required by the larger PBs for their onboarding. ADS Securities’ PoP services would be perfectly suited to their needs” revealed Mr. Baggioli.

Brokers experience liquidity outages all the time due to credit difficulties – this has to change

Going the traditional route of establishing direct relationships with prime brokerages has been recently hampered by the contraction in credit provision by major banks, a matter which often is not on the main agenda of many retail brokerages which obtain their liquidity from liquidity providers which are in the middle of a prime brokerage and a retail broker.

This can result in slippage, liquidity outages and execution difficulties, which in turn creates consumer discomfort and can result in complaints to a regulator, with the broker powerless to resolve it.

Mr. Baggioli explained this subject in detail. “If a broker is technically restricted to one feed, for example they take ADSS’ feed, then it is much easier to comply with best execution requirements because it is the aggregation of the very best liquidity available in the market at any moment in time. On the contrary, if you have an order book which is made up of the pricing that comes from a single bank provider only, then that is the order book of that bank, not the market.”

“In my opinion, going back to what I described earlier” said Mr. Baggioli, “retail brokers that are purely local and do not have large enough volume to make prime brokerages happy should not go the prime nor prime of primes routes, but instead should come to us and that way it will cost them nothing per million.” – Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities LLC.

As a case in point, we are able to show them liquidity from the top banks and venues in the world, which is as good an approximation of best execution as it gets in the current FX market. This would make sure that brokers would be compliant in terms of what they need to satisfy in terms of regulation and save several dollars per million on each trade” said Mr. Baggioli.

What is that $5 per million and what are you paying for?

“I am hearing more and more that there are people out there that sell prime of prime at very low fees, for example $5 per million. How can they do this?! Their own external provider fees, between PB and pre-trade risk management cost them more or less that much, so it does not add up. It is my opinion that these providers are not offering a true prime brokerage, instead they are extracting an extra $5 and stating that it is for prime brokerage, when in fact they are simply showing their client their aggregated liquidity which should come for free ” said Mr. Baggioli.

“For those who don’t need to have a direct relationship between client and liquidity provider and simply want liquidity from a reputable institutional broker, this should not carry additional costs. Why others charge for this I have no idea, we are doing it for free” – Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities.

The next thing that comes into play is capital. Some firms offering similar services to ADS Securities do not have a large enough capital base to have credit lines with prime brokerages to allow clients to hold large positions overnight.

What will be achieved with the new prime brokerage service?

The launch of a new prime brokerage in this sense is a rarity indeed these days. Andrew Saks-McLeod met with Mr. Baggioli in London in order to go through a series of matters which the new service will address:

What’s next in the evolution of this exciting service?

We are launching our prime services for FX Spot supporting both ADSS’ and external liquidity and for NDFs for external liquidity only. We are already working to add ADSS’ own liquidity on the NDFs side. The key focus will certainly be on fine tuning our POP offering to individual client needs over the coming months.

What do you think is the perceived unbalance in the FX value chain that exists globally at the moment?

It is in fact an actual unbalance and the consequences can be devastating for all those FX players whose business model is centred on having a PB provider.

I appreciate that most FX players come from the trading and sales side of the industry and when setting up their own shop have been and still are more focused on securing the front end technology then taking a better care of the back end but this approach is utterly wrong.

The most important success factor has always been having a strong PB relationship in place and it has now become critical, a matter of life or death. Most people I have met in this industry agree to pay $5 per million for liquidity aggregation services, in other words some code and electricity, and at the same time force their PB to negotiating the provision of very valuable credit lines and access to liquidity venues down to a fraction of what they pay for connectivity. Pure madness! – Marco Baggioli, COO, ADS Securities LLC

Some of us are even upset when the PBs refuse to share very expensive and limited settlement lines for the physical delivery of FX: why would they do that for a couple of bucks which are barely covering for their own CLS costs, not to say the service they provide? The very same people who expect this from their PB would be the first one to say no way were they on the other side of the trade. Deliverable FX need be traded wider than notional position taking.

The rebalance must happen sooner rather than later as no one would benefit from another PB dropping out. We must ensure that we pay PBs a fair price for what they provide and limit our connectivity cost to no more than 10% of that if the industry wants to survive.

How does ADS Securities ensure longstanding relationships with its PBs?

ADS Securities senior management’ take on the Firm’s relationships with our banking providers is that we all must ensure that our bankers are happy with the relationship and the business they see from ADS Securities.

Photographs courtesy of ADS Securities

The post “The whole industry needs to change” – Debate over de facto execution models as ADS Securities launches true prime of prime appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

This day in history: May 20, 2011: Saxo Bank provides TD Waterhouse with FX and CFD trading for UK market

$
0
0

FinanceFeeds -

In episode seven of this series on FinanceFeeds, we take a look back at “This day in history” within the world of FX. Every Friday morning, we take a journey through annuls of time to look at the various groundbreaking developments that continue to take place in our fascinating industry.

Five years ago today, technology-led electronic trading company Saxo Bank signed a deal with TD Waterhouse, which is the brand used for a Canadian brokerage within Toronto-Dominion Bank, and which was also formerly used for TD’s American and British brokerages.

unnamed (3)

Saxo Bank demonstrates its OpenAPI solution to FinanceFeeds in Hellerup, Denmark, December 2015

Back in 2011, white label partnerships provided by non-bank electronic trading firms that develop their own proprietary technology were relatively rare, however Saxo Bank had long since been an expert in such integrations of its trading environment within large institutions, a facet of the company’s business which has evolved further over the last year with the introduction of the Open API based SaxoTraderGo device neutral solution.

Nowadays, Saxo Bank white label partners can access the code and develop their own integrated trading applications for multiple puposes.

Meeting with Saxo Bank Senior Director and Head of OpenAPI Benny Boye Johansen at the company’s head office in Hellerup, Denmark in December last year, FinanceFeeds took a close look at the ethos behind its development, drawing on 24 years of Saxo Bank’s fintech prowess.

“A good way of explaining the main idea behind the OpenAPI solution is perhaps to view Saxo Bank as an engine in the middle of the trading environment” said Mr. Johansen. “You probably know that we are connected to a lot of exchanges, liquidity providers and we package our solution so that it can be used very flexibly to suit the purpose of various end clients and institutions which operate differently to each other such as white label partners, banks, fund managers and specialist trading firms” said Mr. Johansen.

“And so, we have always had an open infrastructure. For many years we offered liquidity through a FIX API, we have used our Trade Event Notification Service (TENS) for execution drop copy and essentially keeping our system in sync with those of our close collaborators, we have more than 300 “End of Day files” for reporting and reconciliation, and we provide a variety of administrative tools and web services to allow shallow or deep integration with our partner companies” – Benny Boye Johansen, Senior Director & Head of OpenAPI, Saxo Bank

“What is new with OpenAPI is that it allows a third party client, client company or application developer to not only integrate into our infrastructure, but to essentially completely rewrite the front end trading application. So if you take a step back, I would say that OpenAPI is a complement, and additional piece in the puzzle in the ways you may work with Saxo Bank” concluded Mr. Johansen.

unnamed (1)

Andrew Saks-McLeod previews the SaxoTraderGo device neutral platform, Paris, France, 2015

On the face of it, five years is a veritable lifetime in this fast moving industry, however by 2011, Saxo Bank had amassed several years in the development and integration of its solutions into those of institutions in the form of white label partnerships, therefore taking FX and CFD trading to TD Waterhouse was an interesting move in that Toronto Dominion Bank is a banking institution yet it took its feed from Saxo Bank, which is a fintech company and electronic trading provider.

The movement toward electronic platforms and the ecosystem behind them was very much on Toronto Dominion Bank’s agenda in 2011, as just before onboarding Saxo Bank’s white label solution, TD Ameritrade had bought North American trading platform company thinkorswim which was founded by Tom Sosnoff in 1999.

ThinkorSwim provides services including thinkDesktop, webBasedTrading, thinkAnywhere, thinkMobile, thinkMicro, and paperMoney, and the ActiveTrader component of such products to provide access to exchanges in Chicago, including the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE).

The solution offered by the TD Waterhouse and Saxo Bank white label partnership was a direct market access solution which was connected to the TD Derivatives Web Trader platform as well as the TD Derivatives Professional platform, with commissions on CFD equity trades starting from 0.15% (minimum £15) on all markets. The account also included Futures, enabling customers to trade over 450 instruments on live market prices from over 15 exchanges around the world.

Featured Image: Saxo Bank, Hellerup, Denmark, Copyright FinanceFeeds

The post This day in history: May 20, 2011: Saxo Bank provides TD Waterhouse with FX and CFD trading for UK market appeared first on FinanceFeeds.

Viewing all 886 articles
Browse latest View live